{"id":1558,"date":"2007-12-14T13:18:00","date_gmt":"2007-12-14T18:18:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.actec.org\/?post_type=capital-letter&p=1558"},"modified":"2024-01-03T16:27:50","modified_gmt":"2024-01-03T21:27:50","slug":"finance-committee-starts-to-study-the-estate-tax-again","status":"publish","type":"capital-letter","link":"https:\/\/www.actec.org\/capital-letter\/finance-committee-starts-to-study-the-estate-tax-again\/","title":{"rendered":"Finance Committee Starts to Study the Estate Tax Again"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Committee leaders view repeal as preferable but impractical.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Congress is struggling. It has voted to fund the federal government for just one week, pending resolution of tough issues about permanent funding, including contentious issues involved with Iraq policy. The idea of a one-year patch for the individual alternative minimum tax is still very attractive, but Congress is nowhere near a consensus on how to do it. It\u2019s late in the year, and the last weeks of the year are not typically the most productive. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In the midst of all this, the estate tax still keeps coming up. Surprisingly so, especially in a Democratic Congress, as Capital Letters have previously noted. (See\u00a0Capital Letter Number 3<\/a>, May 7, 2007, \u201cSurprising Attention to the Estate Tax in Congress.\u201d) \u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n On October 4, 2007, the\u00a0Senate Finance Committee<\/a>\u00a0was considering the tax features of an energy, conservation, and agriculture tax package entitled the \u201cHeartland, Habitat, Harvest, and Horticulture Act of 2007<\/a>.\u201d (You have to love these names!) In the course of that consideration,\u00a0Senator K<\/a>yl (R-AZ)<\/a>\u00a0proposed an amendment that would set the estate tax exemption at $5 million indexed for inflation, tie the estate tax rate above $5 million to the capital gains tax income tax rate (currently 15%), and add a 30% bracket beginning at $25 million. This is essentially the same as the estate tax provisions in\u00a0H.R. 5970<\/a>, the\u00a0\u201cEstate Tax and Extension of Tax Relief Act of 2006\u201d (\u201cETETRA\u201d)<\/a>, which the House of Representatives passed in July 2006 but which the Senate declined to consider in a failed cloture vote on August 3, 2006.\u00a0Senator Kyl<\/a>\u00a0withdrew the amendment after Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) promised to hold a hearing on estate tax reform \u201clater in the year,\u201d with the goal of marking up a bill in the spring of 2008. \u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n The\u00a0Finance Committee<\/a>\u00a0held that hearing on November 14, 2007. On the day before the hearing, the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation released a document entitled \u201cHistory, Present Law, and Analysis of the Federal Wealth Transfer Tax System<\/a>.\u201d This 48-page document includes an 8-page history of U.S. transfer taxes from 1797 through the present, a 12-page description of current law, and a 25-page section entitled \u201cBackground and Analysis Relating to Estate and Gift Taxation.\u201d This last section analyzes levels of revenue, compares the transfer tax systems in several countries, and discusses the effects taxes on capital might have on wealth distribution, investment, and other economic behavior. Clearly written from an economist\u2019s perspective, the document will not satisfy ACTEC Fellows who are most concerned with problems of compliance and administrability on a client-by-client basis. \u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n At the hearing,\u00a0a manufacturer from Iowa\u00a0and\u00a0a rancher from Nevada\u00a0advocated repeal of the estate tax or at least a substantial increase in the exemption.\u00a0Billionaire Warren Buffett<\/a>\u00a0supported a steeply progressive estate tax (with an exemption of perhaps $4 million), which he viewed as necessary to prevent \u201cplutocracy.\u201d\u00a0ACTEC Fellow Conrad Teitell\u00a0pointed out the caprice of current law and the complexities and uncertainties faced in estate planning \u2013 basically picking up where the Joint Committee document left off. \u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n